when greed triumphs human needs? Why do we not produce for people who are not valued because they have no purchasing power? Why do we market all these UNNECESSARY crap by manipulating demand for those in developed countries, while there are people who are starving elsewhere? Why cannot we instead think of a new system where we produce stuff to fulfil a human need? If money was not the driving force in the economy, we could create sustainable solutions that would otherwise not be profitable because the goal was previously about maximizing profit which is in direct opposition to providing long term solutions and products to people who need them the most. It is not that this monetary system efficiently allocates resources, as we'd have ended world poverty by now considering we have the ability to do so. Nobody needs all this new sh*t; things we're told to want because our lives in a consumerist culture are so meaningless.
All goods and services would be equally avaliable to all people. People take what they need, and work to their ability.

republicans do all they can to obstruct anyone from doing this. Not the lower class but the rich ones are invested in the drug companies for example. People are so much healthier when they learn how to him themselves but our country is set up so that we have McDonald's making people sick they go to the Dr. get meds. get other problems from the meds & end up in hospital it just goes around in circles. This is why the reps. call libs. tree huggers cause libs love nature & would give up a job knowing there are plenty more when you do the right thing.

Why Market with Flimp eVideo direct marketing solutions?

8 Responses to “How is a system of money a logical way to allocate resources?”

  • ~ says:

    Would you rather your boss pay you in chickens?

    I know that libs are wanting the US to be turned into a third world nation… But come on.. this is getting out of hand.

    I know the difference between WANT and NEED. That is why, even though I am out of work right now, we still have the same standard of living that we had when I did. We saved.

    My car is old, my clothes are old, I don't have the latest phone… and I don't care.
    References :

  • Live Free Or Die www.lp.org says:

    If you take away cash and give credits or something online then who is to say that a certain group can not control your life and threaten to take away your credits if you do not comply.

    The cash I keep in my bra is the only little bit of freedom I have. You want to destroy that?
    References :

  • Senor Magoo says:

    Hippies need a bath.

    I like clean towels and hot running water when I bathe. That costs money.
    References :

  • Matthew W says:

    Because, the government cannot be in charge of anything very well, even necessities. There was mass starvation in USSR when they switched to communism, because the regulations decreased output.

    If something isn't worth what it is payed for, then their is a deficit created, and deficits eventually have to be called in. That causes the fall of said system.

    My friend once said that if all the money spent on Ice cream was donated to end world hunger, their wouldn't be a problem, but he forgot all those put out of work because no one was buying ice cream.

    Just because you need something doesn't mean you deserve it.

    Edit: So, "to each according to his need, from each according to his ability" (Karl Marx)

    So, when a company has decreased output, those that had worked best will have to work harder, and those that are in worse of situations will get paid more, whether or not those two correlate. You would make need = deserve. People then work hard to need things rather than deserve them, and those that work better will only get worked harder, so why would they work… For the betterment of mankind? Yeah right.

    Search critisisms of Communism or Marxism in Wikipedia.
    References :

  • send good thoughts to me says:

    republicans do all they can to obstruct anyone from doing this. Not the lower class but the rich ones are invested in the drug companies for example. People are so much healthier when they learn how to him themselves but our country is set up so that we have McDonald's making people sick they go to the Dr. get meds. get other problems from the meds & end up in hospital it just goes around in circles. This is why the reps. call libs. tree huggers cause libs love nature & would give up a job knowing there are plenty more when you do the right thing.
    References :

  • boatdoctorjeff says:

    obviously, you are a liberal and have no job.Try working for a living, it can be very fulfilling and (at least for the moment) you can accumulate wealth if you have the will power to not blow all of your $$
    or give it all to the government so they can blow it for you!
    References :

  • bluechristy says:

    There is nothing wrong with earning an honest living .

    Unfortunately some Wealthy ( and other wise ) Conservative Republican Capitalists have an unnatural mind set that says Money is more important then humans and actually more important then most life here on earth . They are unnatural predators .
    References :
    My opinion

  • Ms. Burb says:

    Well, we could decide to use Flintstone vitamins as our unit of currency but Fred and Wilma's face would probably melt off in transactions…
    References :

Leave a Reply