Simply releasing capital does not direct its flow in any particular direction. Cons always argue that if the wealthy could ‘keep’ more money they would simply hire more employees and pay higher wages. However both factors are affected by the labor market, not the tax rates. A tighter labor market forces businesses to pay higher wages and diminish work loads to maintain employees who could easily switch jobs, thus creating the need for more employees and more jobs. A loose labor market allows employers to pay lower wages and increase productivity as they know they can replace an employee who balks at his/her work load increasing and therefore back off from hiring. And its interesting to note that while promoting something that does not directly affect wages as employment as a solution conservatives also promote free trade agreements and H1B visa programs that deliberately keep the labor market lax. What do you have to say for yourselves?
Bet you shop at wal mart huh!!!! Socialism is a form of slavery Want an example Hugo Chavez!!! and it’s people like him that 0bama just adore!!!!!
ask that in the economics section
you liberal government economists get your behind handed over there every day and outsmarted by free marketeers and austrian economists
try it
i know stink when i see stink
References :
You are confused. It is Obama throwing money willy nilly all over the place and not accomplishing jack.
References :
Why do liberals always project their screwups on others.
Bet you shop at wal mart huh!!!! Socialism is a form of slavery Want an example Hugo Chavez!!! and it’s people like him that 0bama just adore!!!!!
References :
Silly
References :
It absolutely does direct where it goes. If the rich wind up with more capital they don’t stick it in a big vault in their basement and swim in it ala Scrooge McDuck. They build new homes, buy new cars, buy boats and planes. They grow their businesses and hire more workers. Of course I understand the lefts problem with all that. They don’t control the flow of capital. In other words, they can’t buy votes.
References :